Time: Monday 1.12.2008 at 2:05 - 3:20 PM Place: AgC223.1, project meeting space Present: * Tuomas Mäenpää, secretary * Teemu Nisu * Richard Domander * Tommi Teistelä, chairman * Matthieu Weber * Ville Isomöttönen Minutes 1. Opening Chairman Tommi Teistelä opened the meeting at 2:05 PM. Presence of quorum was confirmed. 2. Approval of Agenda Ville asked if there should be an additional item for examining the known bugs or should it be looked in the item 5. It was decided to be talked about in the item 5. Decisions * Agenda was approved with the following remarks: o Bugs should be talked about in the item 5. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting Tommi went through the main points of the minutes of the previous meeting. He asked from Richard if the newest version of the Application report is in the SVN and Richard agreed. Tommi also noted that project team actually did some "monkey testing" with the MPlayer and it didn't crash. During item 6 Tommi went through the tasks of iteration 4. Ville commented that all of the tasks should be listed in the same place at the end of the minutes. Tasks * Team o Delivering the document containing the time usage of each member to the supervisor was done. o Writing project report was started. o New features have been partly tested and the testing report almost complete. o Audio level compression filter has been implemented without any feedback yet. o Fixing remaining issues is incomplete. * Client o Matthieu brought more testing material. Decisions * The minutes were approved with the following modifications: o All weekly tasks should be listed in the same place at the end of minutes. 4. Progress since previous meeting Tuomas presented the time usage charts and explained the differences between the planned hours and time actually used. He noted that there was particularly no issues with these. The state of the features was discussed next. Richard had improved the subtitles, but there seemed to be a delay of half a second in some test files. Matthieu and Richard then discussed about this matter and Richard wondered why it seemed like there is only problems with the YLE 1 channel. There was no clear answer for this. Matthieu also explained his method of testing subtitles. He used a program that presents the subtitles in a graphical format. Teemu then explained that he had solved the bug with the progress bar. It was a matter of correction of one line in the code. Richard left the meeting for about a minute to get one of the testing report about subtitles. He and Matthieu then analyzed the report. There seems to be a big delay in some subtitles, because there is an unusually long delay in time stamps. It was noted that this was the reason why it seemed like some subtitles were missing. It was not clear why there was this delay of about half a second in some subtitles and Tommi concluded that the project team should try to solve this problem in the next iteration. Matthieu also explained that for some reason the seeking function seems to be always about 7 seconds off the target. The team will try to solve problems in the dvb subtitles code as well as the rest of the known bugs. 5. Reviewing the testing plan & report The latest version of Testing plan was briefly examined. There were some changes since last time, but no reason for modification were given during the reviewing. There was a discussion why to use paper form reports for testing because there are lots of good software options available. Since the project team already uses Trac and it has a built-in ticketing sysmet it would have been a good alternative. Ville commented to this that the paper format is good since the documentation of the projects is stored to a binder. 6. Deciding tasks for iteration 5 Tuomas went through the work plan for iteration 5. Basically the hours are divided between writing the reports, fixing bugs and testing. Ville asked if we had implemented and tested the audio compressor filter yet. Tommi answered that the filter was in the new patch and can be tested now by the client. There was discussion about the volnorm and the audio filter and how to use them. The way seemed to work but it might need some tweaking. Ville concluded this item by summarizing that there are two documents that needs to be written, some bugs to be solved, one presentation to be held and chapter about the leffakone environment to be written during the next iteration. At this point Teemu left the meeting and others continued to the next item. Decisions * In conclusion the team should use most of their time in the iteration 5 for writing the documents and to fix the issues with the features. The rest of the time should be used to prepare to second presentation and to continue the testing. 7. Weekly tasks Tasks * Team o Send the latest versions of documents to Ville. o Add bug tickets to Trac. * Client o Test audio filter and other features. After some minutes of discussion about weekly tasks, Teemu came back to meeting. 8. Miscellaneous topics The state of the project was talked about again. Tuomas wondered if there is enough time left to finalize the project during the iteration 5. It was decided that this will be decided later on the iteration 5. Decisions * The final number of iterations in the project Muksis is decided later. 9. Decision of the time and place for the next meeting The next official meeting was decided to be held on Wednesday, 10.12. at 12 PM. 10. Closing Chairman Tommi Teistelä closed the meeting at 3:20 PM